Frequently asked questions

Read specific frequently asked questions for each of the following main stakeholder groups:

General questions and answers regarding the policy and legislation are also provided below.

What is strategic cropping land?

Queensland's best cropping land - strategic cropping land (SCL) - is a finite resource that must be conserved and managed for the long-term benefit of all Queenslanders.

Currently, the state's SCL resources are subject to a range of competing land-use activities, including agriculture, mining and urban development. Some of these activities can permanently impact this land, making it unavailable for cropping.

Criteria for identifying SCL will be used in the on-ground assessment of areas shown on the trigger map. These criteria are specified in the Strategic Cropping Land Act 2011 (PDF)*.

Development on areas confirmed to be SCL will be subject to the requirements of the legislation. 

What area of the state does the SCL legislation apply to?

The SCL legislation applies to approximately 42 million hectares of Queensland, or about one-quarter of the state's landmass. Within this area, the trigger map identifies some 7.49 million hectares (4.34 per cent) of the state as areas where SCL may exist and where developers will need to undertake an on-ground assessment using the proposed criteria.

Within this area, the two protection areas apply to a total of 4.78 million hectares (2.77 per cent of the state), of which 1.84 million hectares is identified on the trigger map as areas where SCL may exist. The management area covers some 37.2 million hectares (21.54 per cent) of the state, 5.6 million hectares of which is identified on the trigger map.

What are permanent impacts and who will assess them?

Permanent impacts occur when a use located on or near SCL will endure for 50 years or more, and prevents cropping during that time or in the future. 

Examples may include:

Permanent impacts will be assessed and determined by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) as the authority administering the SCL legislation. For resource developments, the legislation sets out the types of activities that will be deemed as those that permanently impact SCL.

For urban developments under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 the development assessment component is administered by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) using the State Planning Assessment Provisions (SDAP).

The chief executive of Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (DSDIP) is the assessment manager or referral agency for all development applications where the state has an interest.

View more information about the changes for development assessments under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.

Where are the protection areas and why were they chosen?

Two protection areas are identified in the legislation:

These areas were chosen as protection areas as they are areas of the state that are under intense and imminent development pressure, and contain large aggregations of the state's best cropping land.

The boundaries of the protection areas are based on defining large contiguous areas of valuable cropping land. Where possible, these boundaries have been aligned to features such as rivers, State forests, local government boundaries and property boundaries.

How does the SCL legislation affect the coal seam gas industry?

Developments, including coal seam gas (CSG) operations, proposed on SCL are assessed under the legislation.

Well-designed CSG operations may be able to be accommodated under this legislation without permanently impacting the land. For example, gas wells and pipelines are usually considered to have a temporary impact, as the land can be restored back to its former SCL condition when the development ends. This type of infrastructure carried out in an appropriate manner may be able to proceed on SCL.

However, high-impact CSG infrastructure such as water storage ponds and gas compression stations may permanently impact SCL and a proponent is not able to undertake these activities in protection areas, except in limited 'exceptional circumstances'.

In the management area, proposed developments are assessed to ensure that they make all reasonable efforts to avoid and minimise any impacts on SCL. Proponents are required to mitigate their impacts if CSG infrastructure is unable to avoid SCL and is likely to cause permanent impacts.

It is important to recognise that some CSG companies are already making positive efforts to structure their developments in a way which facilitates co-existence with SCL. For example, there are CSG proponents who have committed to actions such as:

Does the SCL framework apply to urban areas?

The framework does not apply to areas in the urban footprint under a regional plan or to areas that are included in existing urban zones in planning schemes.

The State Government has released a single State Planning Policy that simplifies and clarifies the State's interests for planning and development. The policy is available on the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and website.

The State Planning Policy must be considered when areas of SCL are designated for urban purposes in regional plans and local planning schemes.

What is the role of the Community Advisory Group?

The Community Advisory Group will provide advice before the government makes a decision on expenditure from the mitigation fund. Funds will be targeted to activities that provide an enduring, public benefit and increase cropping productivity in areas affected by the loss of SCL.

The Community Advisory Group will be convened as needed. Advice will be sought from a range of sectors, including agriculture, rural, resources and local government, as well as other experts as required.

What is an 'exceptional circumstance'?

Proposed developments are not permitted to permanently impact SCL in a protection area except in demonstrated 'exceptional circumstances'.

Developments considered to be an exceptional circumstance will be rare and uncommon. The Minister may declare, in special circumstances, that a development presents a scarce or overwhelmingly significant opportunity to benefit the State.

The benefits may include a social or community service, or an economic benefit to the State that overrides the need to protect SCL resources from permanent impacts.

To be considered an exceptional circumstance, the development proponent must demonstrate that:

Developments that are assessed as exceptional circumstances are still required to make all efforts to avoid and minimise any impacts on SCL, and mitigate any permanent impacts.

* Requires Adobe Reader

Last updated 3 December 2013

Strategic cropping land